Boston- The racism and bigotry keeps flowing from the Boston police force as an officer sends around a horrid e-mail to try to intimidate a female journalist.
Justin Barrett of the Boston PD sent this email to Yvonne Abraham of the Boston Globe. Here is the full text of the e-mail:
[REDACTED]@yahoo.com>? wrote:Article writer, That was, by far, the worst article I’ve ever read. I am a former English teacher, writer, current police officer, father, husband and military veteran. You need to be corrected and I certainly hope others have attempted, for your written messages and material is so 4th grade level, I am embarassed I paid the 1.50 for the paper [rest assured, it is my aim to tell as many readers The Boston Globe and your biased reporting is both sub standard and strictly one sided]. For you are not professional and basically, your writing is ridiculous. A reader may assume, per your article, that criminals are never well-dressed with a tucked in polo [2nd paragraph]. Your defense [4th paragraph] of Gates while he is on the phone while being confronted [INDEED] with a police officer is assuming he has rights when considered a suspect. He is a suspect and will always be a suspect. His first priority of effort should be to get off the phone and comply with police, for if I was the officer he verbally assaulted like a banana-eating jungle monkey, I would have sprayed him int he face with OC deserving of his belligerent non-compliance. Further [5th paragraph], a reader may assume that crimes only happen in back alleys at 0300?! You’re kidding me, right? Are you still in the 5th grade, Catholic School? That paragraph was as pathetic as jungle monkey gibberish – I might as well ax you the question, “Is this your first test at reporting?” You do not understand roles, tactics and dangers police officers face, as apparently you think no one wearing a polo might possess a firearm or knife on his/her person. Might you fathom a woman could be a criminal? Or are criminals all hairy, dirty, stinky, mean looking ugly men? You are a hot little bird with minimal experiences in a harsh field. You are a fool. An infidel. You have no business writing for a US newspaper nevermind detailing and analyzing half truths. You should serve me coffee and donuts on Sunday morning. My last point counters your final 2 paragraphs, in which you state Gates is “this immensely famous expert on race” – you really have to be kidding me? Famous for what? Expert why and says who? What has he done for me and my family? What has he done for the law enforcement community or military veterans or to secure freedoms and our borders in this country? What has he done to help limit and reduce my income tax? He has proven to work to get himself attention and become a wealthy lecturer. He lectures students on the subject of racial ethics and profiling. Jee whiz. I must attend that lecture lest I lose my identity and right to free speech and the right to celebrate God and beliefs as I see fit. I am not a racist, but I am prejudice towards people who are stupid and pretend to stand up and preach for something they claim is freedom when it is merely attention because you do not receive enough of it in your little fear-dwelling circle of on-the-bandwagon followers. You mention Gates’ charges were dropped but that it was too late to stop the damage? Damage? Still kidding? You need to serve a day with the infantry and get swarmed by black gnats while manning your sector. Or you just need to get slapped, look in the mirror and admit, “Wow, I am a failure. I am a follower. Who am I kidding?” Again, I like a warm cruller and hot Panamanian, black. No sugar. Your final statement reads, “Gates, whose great success has allowed him to transcend the racial divide-” to which I ask, when did he transcend? He indeed has transcended back to a bumbling jungle monkey, this he forever tremains amid this nation’s great social/racial divide that makes it a free and great nation mixed with craze and awkward differences. Go ahead, ax me what I think? Gates is a goddamned fool and you the article writer simply a poor follower and maybe worse, a poor writer. Your article title should read CONDUCT UNBECOMING A JUNGLE MONKEY-BACK TO ONE’S ROOTS. JB
There is obviously more than just racism in Barrett’s email.
Massive grammar and spelling errors aside, Barrett’s email displays a stultifying level of ignorance and violence. Underneath the repeated racial slurs and attitude that Gates “will always be a suspect,” Barrett includes an overwhelming sense of misogyny in his rant. Instead of attempting to debate specific points of Yvonne Abraham’s article, he instead repeatedly demands that the “hot little bird” serve him “a warm cruller and hot Panamanian [coffee].” Not only does Barrett substitute macho posturing for cogent dialogue, he repeatedly brings up his military service as proof that his views are superior by default. The most prominent example of this is when he suggests that Abraham needs to “get slapped” and admit being a “failure” because she didn’t volunteer for military service like he did.
Abraham has since written another piece about this mess, where she takes the higher road. Stating that she had quickly deleted Barrett’s email because “Like so many of these kinds of e-mails, it was an anonymous rant.”
Despite being firmly ensconced in “the north,” the city known as “The Cradle of Liberty” Boston has had a long history of racism.
So long, in fact, that a Harvard panel was convened to discuss racism and segregation in Boston. From the violence spawned from Louise Day Hicks‘ campaign against court-ordered busing, to Charles Stuart murdering his pregnant wife and concocting a fictitious African-American assailant, the recent antics of James Crowley and Justin Barrett only add to Boston’s sour reputation on race.